17 08 2022

About a moon ago, a friend pointed out to me that by googling Sophiscophonythe only results were my book! She said how interesting to have a unique result on google. Today, on google and bing, other businesses are listed before my site, which rather demonstrates the lack of integrity of the web, or rather the truth about advertisement.

Since the only way to buy a book is to buy one from me, and neither of the ‘other businesses’ have, the fact that they are being displayed as a first result is due to advertising revenue.

While that can be known to be a ‘price’ of doing business, at what cost to society is the ‘minor’ deception?

If in such a small matter, the internet acts in the interest of receiving payment, where does the interest stop?

Whose interest is being served by the rest of the names on the list? How many months until my website, as the original poster of the book isn’t included in the top results, and is replaced by paid advertisements? While the arguement that ‘it is good for business,’ will of course be used, the true question, is the practice good for quality of life, must be asked.

That is the millennium blues for this month.

Stay Blessed!


New Book!!! The latest in the Poetic Phonetic series – Sophiscophony

17 07 2022



The cover of my latest book! Praise g>d it is complete.

Mostly, it draws parallels between g>d’s word, and today’s world. How the enmity between woman and the serpent is influencing the U.S, and the methods that the serpent is using.

Please shop at



31 05 2022

I’ve been helping to edit a newsletter for Real Utopia, an international organization devoted to activism, participatory socialism and stirring the pot! Here is an article from a member David Rovics, who is a traveling musician, and lives in Portland.

When the Shooting Ended

Some thoughts on precisely what it is that makes the United States so exceptional.  Spoiler alert:  Europe is full of racists, too, but they don’t have mass shootings every day.  You can also listen to this in podcast formread this on my blog, or read it in this weekend’s edition of Counterpunch.

All over the US media there are discussions taking place, as one would expect, about the slaughter of 10 people in Buffalo, New York, by a young white supremacist in body armor with a rapid-fire weapon.  I have heard no discussion about the phenomenon of mass shootings in general in the US compared to other countries, in this round of discussion.  Lots of discussion about the many reasons for mass shootings to happen, without any explanation for what makes the US so exceptional in this regard, aside from implied explanations that can be very misleading, whether intentionally so or not.

As the pundits try to dissect the motivations of the killer in this massacre, we hear a lot about social media misinformation, Fox News propaganda, our country’s terrible history of racism, and the ongoing propagation of institutional racism today.  We also hear about different gun laws, efforts at controlling the proliferation of assault weapons, the power of the gun lobby, and the sanctity of the Second Amendment.  We hear about mental health, and the ongoing failure of the public health sector to basically exist in any meaningful form in this country, though they don’t put it that way.

It has been mentioned that the Buffalo massacre was the 200th mass shooting in the United States so far in 2022, and it’s only mid-May.  What isn’t mentioned is that most of the other mass shootings involved men killing their families, or men targeting women.  Misogyny is so endemic, it apparently doesn’t bear mentioning anymore, like the sun rising in the east.

One of the people that the Buffalo killer was inspired by, according to his online rantings, was the fascist mass murderer in Norway, Anders Breivik.

As horrific as Breivik’s murder spree of helpless young people confined to an island in the summer of 2011 was, the obvious question that I don’t hear the media asking at all is why was that massacre in Norway in 2011 so exceptional, whereas mass shootings in the US kill more people than were killed in Utoya about every two weeks, in a “normal” month.

I have personally been deeply affected by gun violence.  Two of my best friends were shot to death, and these experiences were formative for me.  My father and stepmother live down the street from Newtown, Connecticut.  She sang at funerals of the children killed there at Sandy Hook Elementary.

I also spend a lot of time in Europe, in countries where very few people — especially people younger than my parents — have had any experience at all with gun violence.  Despite the 2011 massacre there, one of those countries with very little gun violence is Norway.  But why the comparative lack of mass shootings — or gun violence of any kind — there and elsewhere in Europe?  What are the fundamental differences between these societies that cause the US to have such a vastly higher rate of mass shootings, homicides, and even suicides than any other countries (that aren’t having a civil war)?

There are a lot of things that make the US exceptional, but there are also a lot of things that the US has in common with the many other countries in the world that do not have a big problem with mass shootings or gun violence generally.  I’d like to focus on a few of the similarities first.

When we hear about Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Charleston, El Paso — all massacres carried out by white supremacists who set out to kill people from a particular group — there is naturally discussion of how people develop these warped beliefs, how anyone becomes so troubled that they’d commit a massacre, what is it about our society that gave rise to people with these beliefs, and what is it that nurtures their ongoing hatred.  All important questions with lots of important answers.

But when we take as a whole a collection of countries that haven’t had anything like this kind of rate of mass shootings or homicides, such as the EU, how would we answer the same sorts of questions about European societies, and what do we do with that information?  To briefly attempt an overview here, in terms of history there is no question:  Europe is where all the white supremacists came from in the first place.  When my parents were young, the US was an apartheid state, by law, and Black people were commonly terrorized by racist police and lynch mobs.  By contrast, in Europe when my parents were young, a Nazi regime was systematically gassing to death millions of people for being of the wrong race, religion, national origin, or political affiliation, among other things.

In all the countries occupied by the Nazis, there were local Nazis who worked with the occupiers.  There was lots of resistance, sabotage, etc., but there was also lots of collaboration.  There were, and are, loads of racists all over Europe.  Since the defeat of fascism in Europe, far right parties and movements have persisted, and xenophobic, openly racist rightwing governments form on a regular basis historically and in recent years as well.

Although the welfare state is generally much more functional in Europe than in the US, if you travel around you will find in city after city ghetto after ghetto.  They are decidedly in better shape than the abandoned, burned-out neighborhoods of St Louis or Trenton.  But they are definitely ghettos, the people living in them feel like they live in a ghetto, and their governments pass laws they call things like “Ghetto Laws,” an ongoing source of tremendous pain and tension in Denmark right now.

In many other wealthy nations you will find ghettoized, racialized groups of people who are subjugated in many different ways.  Oftentimes you’ll find similar percentages cropping up — like the percentage of Maori people in New Zealand society and the percentage of Maori inmates in New Zealand’s prisons is very similar to the percentages of Black people in US society at large, and in the prisons in the US, like around 15% of the population and 60% of the inmates or thereabouts.

We hear a lot about rightwing media bias, and proliferation of lies on social media, both being big problems.  And they clearly are, but when we look across the Atlantic we will find many of the same corporations owning the media landscapes there, too, along with the same social media platforms being used by similar percentages of the populations of countries in Scandinavia, Germany, England, etc.  They generally have better school systems, but their countries are also full of rightwing media tabloids and social media algorithms loaded with hate speech and disinformation.

With the extremely high rate of femicide in the US — five women per day in the US — once again, in Europe I see men and women interacting exactly like they do in the US.  There are lots of nice, gentle people, and then there are angry, unhappy people.  There are lots of happy-looking couples, and others who argue.  There’s lots of alcoholism in Europe.  Porn is extremely popular there, too.  Sadly there is a lot of male violence against women there, just like here.  But so many fewer femicides.

The argument could certainly be made that things are different in Europe with regards to the welfare state.  That there’s generally a lower level of stress in a society where people are unlikely to end up living in a tent on the sidewalk, like so many thousands of people do in every city on the west coast of the US.  On the other hand, a declining standard of living is a great source of stress for people who are experiencing it, and in the US this was one of the biggest factors determining whether a voter might vote for Trump in 2016.  Regardless of the starting point, there are huge numbers of Europeans experiencing a declining standard of living, feeling very stressed about this, and voting for rightwing parties, just like in the US.

Another frequent talking point is the lack of adequate mental health care in the US.  Sane people who support universal health care point to Europe as a place that has that, where things are better.  While at this point there are some states, like Oregon, where coverage is en par with European societies, the health care situation may be one important distinction that makes the US special.  But in terms of mental health care, by my personal observation, it’s sometimes not such an impressive difference.  I know many people in England who had the option of not more than five sessions with a counselor before they would be told the NHS-funded counseling sessions had come to an end.

So if Europe is also a place full of stressed-out people with declining incomes, rising immigration, insufficient mental health care, a burgeoning far right, ghettoized, racialized minorities, lots of fascists and racists, along with lots of violent men who abuse their partners and others who are inclined to take their own lives, what is it that makes us have such higher rates of homicide, suicide, femicide, and especially mass shootings?

When the shooting ended in the Netherlands in May, 1945, and the last of the German troops occupying the country surrendered, the Dutch people had lived through years of violent repression, some of which was carried out against Dutch people by other Dutch people.  The population was full of both underground antifascist fighters and organizers, as well as lots of informants and Nazi collaborators.  This situation existed in Dutch society from top to bottom.

When the Dutch government-in-exile came back to power, their first priority was the disarming of society.  The first thing they did was initiate a gun roundup.  With society so polarized and so traumatized, the last thing the government wanted was the proliferation of deadly weapons.

I think of this often, ever since I read about it in a book about the last weeks of World War 2 in the Netherlands.  I don’t know whether the US today is more or less polarized than the Netherlands is today, or was back in the immediate post-war period.  But we have a hell of a lot more mass shootings and homicides here.  And as far as I can tell, there is one — and only one — over-riding difference between the two cases that really matters:  in the Netherlands, they took away the guns.


Perceived Means of Production

26 05 2022

What would Karl do? Ha Ha.

I have an opportunity to print my own books, yet the cost is the same as paying someone else to print them.

Two main differences:

making them myself allows an opportunity for community building, yet

the stapled look is less ‘professional’ looking, and may influence the perceived value of the content.

I’m writing about the choices here to practice transparency, and because sometimes it seems that the posts have an effect beyond typing words into a computer in my decision making process.

Again the choices are pretty, or proletariat?

The ‘finished’ looking book will contain no more information, and because today we are all used to interacting with machine produced items, has a more ‘professional’ look.

Right now, the macines which will print cut and glue aren’t available to most people. The spiral binding works, yet often creates torn pages.

Perhaps, the final choice is not mental or political at all, the choice I ought to consider before any other: what will make me happy?





Think Along Thoughts

8 05 2022

A few words about my perspective on blogging these days:

Essentially, here on millenniumblues, I allow a combination of freeflow and structure to work to harmony. Sometimes the ideas take a back seat to alliteration or allusion, and even though I’ve never renewed my poetic license, I think that is completely acceptable.

bell hooks, whom I recently found out was first published by Michael Albert and South End Press once said: “To think of certain ways of writing as activism is crucial, What does it matter if we write eloquently about decolonization if it’s just White privileged kids reading our eloquent theory about it? Masses of Black people suffer from internalized racism; our intellectual work will never impact on their lives if we do not move it out of the academy.”

In several ways, I agree completely. Her words stand in a philosophical truth, and are backed up in song by Gil Scott Heron in his song Message to the Messengers “they don’t know what to say to our young folks, but they know that you do.”

So, though my writing is outside ‘of the academy,’ that may be its’ value. I don’t have the CPU power to run tests on how my writing and poetry may affect anyone socially, though it has literally been street tested. My ideas may not be how a ‘real reporter’ would frame their work, yet because of that they are automatically outside of what Antonio Gramsci would call ‘normative.’

Still Reading

8 05 2022

Several of the books I have read lately are best described as Heavy. From Julia Kristeva’s Revolution in Poetic Language to George Lakoff’s Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, the depth of thought is profound. It has taken me twice to get as far as I have in Lakoff’s book, and I’m only close to finishing the ~400 page part one. How language affects thought is intense! There is an interesting cross over of objectivity and symbolism across artistic genres.

My next book delves into the correlation between symbols and time! That concept isn’t new in itself though. As I was reading Cixin Liu’s The Three Body Problem, I was struck at the parallels between his Trisolarian civilization unfolding atoms, and the folding up of motorcycles into suitcases in cartoons such as The Jetsons. Does the fact that the symbol spans time and cultures reflect an objective reality? Of course, here in the U.S, even speaking of a book called The Three Body Problem can lead people to the wrong idea.

I haven’t written here as often as I thought, once a month is a reasonable goal for now, so see you in another moon cycle!

Language, the Obvious Fall Guy

26 02 2022

I have been teaching myself Chinese since around the start of the pandemic. Learning a new language is exhilirating in several ways. The number of common sounds is of course statistical, yet the number of cross language synonyms is intriguing. I was surprised when I found out how similar the Chinese words for over seas were to Hawaii. Hai3wai4

Another intriguing event is that most colleges and universities in the U.S. have closed the official Chinese language schools, the Confucius Institute. The National Defense Authorization Act has essentially closed all of the Confucius Institutes in the U.S. As Alice (of Wonderland fame) would say, ‘curiouser and curiouser!’ Are all employees of the Confucius Institute spies? The failed prosecution of Anming Hu says not.

As the details of global trade become more streamlined, the suspicion of secrets seems strengthened. Though it is easy to focus the illegal limelight on those who have sold their souls at the crossroads, in regards to global exchange, it may be best to consider who drew the plans for the crossroads to begin with.

Colonialism, capitalism and croneyism are the crux of the economic crossroads, while culture and common citizens catch the heat for the crisis left in the chaos.

Why language and therefore even thought must be sacrificed to the pursuit of profit, g>d only knows.

Citizen Cash

2 02 2022

I just finished reading Citizen Cash, by Michael Stewart Foley. An excellent read about a human, humanitarian, and believer.

I have always admired Johnny Cash, and to learn much more about his life through his politics as a musician and entertainer in thought provoking prose was uplifting, except for one realization. I have a lot more Johnny Cash albums to listen too!

Foley’s research into Cash’s days in Dyess is full of detail, and I was amused to know well before texting, there was an STFU. Exploring Cash’s well known interest in prisoners and First Nations brought to light several interesting facts.

Personally, I was grateful to read how Cash’s faith was treated in the G>d and Country chapter, described with dignity and insight, and in its own way, continuing to provide faith and hope.

Obviously, I’m backing away from the blog a bit, yet since I now have a ‘real live’ web site, Poetic Phonetics, and reading Citizen Cash almost got me to start using social media, I figured a good compromise would be to blog about once a month or so.

Stay Blessed!

Looking Glass

3 12 2021

Two thirds of the way through Atlas Shrugged, and while my initial observation has not changed, Atlantis IS a community of individuals, my life experience has provided insights unavailable to myself earlier. The first, that people of charisma able to gather others towards a cause are not by definition of higher moral principles. The second, that the organization of people loosely called looters, is in fact several groups, and therefore more organized than Ayn Rand provides credit for. However, since her goal is essentially to establish a rational society among (in her mind) an irrational poulation, her focus can be accepted.

Reading my own first paragraph, I find myself falling into the trap of pseudo intelligentsia. I notice I am over using adjectives to describe a simple event.

Ayn Rand doesn’t include Masons, Templar Knights, Lion’s Clubs, Rotary, or any other service group in her novel. That is why to look at Atlas Shrugged as an outline for a group to be is all that is possible. Objectivism has been established, and her ideas are essentially still in play. Whether she in fact founded a new group, or merely added language to the continuing struggle is what must be discerned.

Since the seperation of her heroes into Atlantis is more or less a cloistering, I’m sure my thoughts on the matter are transparent. Her entire description of Atlantis is a group of people practicing ‘spiritual’ values. Though she attributes these values to anyone with the honest capacity of self-reflection, the practice of these values requires an underlying faith in the laws of creation, essentially placing objectivism in the philosophical realm of theism.

Why Rand chooses to not involve her heros with traditional defects such as greed or dishonesty is unimportant. The fact that she does not, furthers the high ideals of her cloistered society, leaving us today, with yet another separation, now between business and individual integrity. Why has no one equated spiritual values of Christianity with business practices? Way beyond the scope of the blog, yet a question which I look to answers for. I’m sure some are there, I’ve not even begun to research myself.

Just a few short notes regarding Atlas Shrugged. I’m not intending to edit any further, though ideas are always under discussion.

Thanks, and until next time, Stay Blessed!

Live From Portland!

25 11 2021


Always interesting to write to an unknown audience. Yet, as every word creates potentially new thoughts, writing is to the unknown. The internal final frontier.

I’m reading Atlas Shrugged for the second time, since I haven’t read that book in a score of years. I found it interesting that the introduction to Dagny Taggert, the lead character, Read the rest of this entry »